Large language models are the heart of the AI revolution. But how many are there, really? Who builds them? What do they cost? And which model is actually the best?
The short answer:
It has gotten messy. In 2026, a new top-tier model shows up roughly every month, prices swing by a factor of 600, and the single most important metric of the past few years, the parameter count, is something the big labs no longer disclose at all.
In this article, I sort through the numbers. API models come from our centrally maintained LLM database, the same one that powers tools like the API cost calculator. Open weights live in the separately generated open source directory. Both sources reflect the state of September 2026.
- Our database tracks 288 LLMs from 35 providers, 126 of them proprietary and 162 openly available.
- GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI's new flagship with a 1.05M-token context window, 128,000 output tokens, and an April 30, 2026 knowledge cutoff. It is available through the API and in ChatGPT Work and Codex for eligible plans.
- Claude Opus 5.5 has been Anthropic's new Opus flagship since September 22, 2026: $4 / $20 per million tokens, 1M context, and a June 2026 knowledge cutoff. GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna round out OpenAI's lineup as cheaper successors to GPT-5.6 Sol and Luna, both with a 1.05M-token context window.
- Qwen 3.8 Flash adds a multimodal API model with a native 1-million-token context. Qwen 3.8 Flash Next adds open weights with 125 billion main-model parameters, 51 billion N-gram embedding parameters, and 6 billion active parameters.
- For coding, Claude Opus 5 still leads at 97.0% SWE-bench Verified per Vals AI, closely followed by the open DeepSeek V4 Pro at 96.4%. Vals AI archived the benchmark as saturated on September 1, 2026, so later models like Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Sol won't show up there.
- Prices range from $0.05 (GPT-5 nano) to $30 (GPT-5.5 Pro) per 1M input tokens. Frontier labs no longer disclose parameter counts.
1. How Many Large Language Models Are There in 2026?
Our database currently tracks 288 large language models from 35 different providers, from GPT-2 in 2019 to the latest flagships in September 2026, including GPT-6 Astra, Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Fable 5.1, Mythos 5.1, and Qwen 3.8 Flash. Qwen 3.8 Flash Next is listed separately in the open source directory so the open weights are not counted as a second API model. This is deliberately a curated selection of the most important models, not a claim to completeness.
For context:
According to the Stanford AI Index 2026, US labs alone shipped around 60 notable models in 2025, Chinese providers about 35. More than 90% of all significant frontier models now come from industry rather than academic research. The market has professionalized and concentrated.
2. The Biggest LLM Providers by Model Count
A simple indicator of how active a lab is: the number of models it maintains. The chart below shows how many of the models we track belong to each provider:
Alibaba leads with 43 models, followed by OpenAI with 41 and Google with 29. That number only measures how deeply a lab maintains its lineup, though, not actual usage. Real market share looks different: in AI chatbot web traffic, ChatGPT dominates, while Gemini and Claude follow behind.
3. Parameters and Architecture: The End of Size Disclosures
For years, the parameter count was the most important metric for a model. GPT-3 had 175 billion, GPT-4 an estimated 1.76 trillion. Then the labs stopped reporting the number.
Today the rule is:
For every current frontier model from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and xAI, the parameter count is officially unknown. Model size has become a trade secret. Concrete, confirmed numbers almost only exist for open-weights models, and those are huge. The new leader is Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 at an official 2.8 trillion parameters (unveiled July 16, 2026, with weights released July 27 under Moonshot’s own “Kimi K3 License”):
The architecture is the striking part. Almost all large models today use a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) design, where only a fraction of the parameters is active per request. DeepSeek-V4-Pro has 1.6 trillion parameters but activates only 49 billion per token, around 3%. Qwen 3.8 Flash Next combines 125 billion main-model parameters with 51 billion N-gram embedding parameters and activates 6 billion parameters per token. That makes giant models affordable to run. In total, 109 of the tracked models are built as MoE.
You can filter and search the full parameter database by provider, size, and type below. For most current frontier models, the parameter column deliberately reads "unknown":
Legend:
Showing 288 models
Model | Developer | Parameters |
|---|---|---|
MiniMax M2.7 MoE | MiniMax | Unknown |
MiniMax M2.5 MoE | MiniMax | Unknown |
GLM-4.7 MoE | Z.ai | Unknown |
GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-6 Sol | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-6 Luna | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.6 Terra | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.5 Pro | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.5 Instant | OpenAI | Unknown |
ChatGPT chat-latest | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.4 | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.4 Pro | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.4 mini | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.4 nano | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.3-Codex | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.3 Instant | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.2 | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.1 Instant | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5.1 Thinking | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5 | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5 Pro | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5 mini | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-5 nano | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-4 Turbo | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-4.1 | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-4.1 nano | OpenAI | Unknown |
GPT-3.5 Turbo | OpenAI | Unknown |
o3 | OpenAI | Unknown |
o3-pro | OpenAI | Unknown |
o3-mini | OpenAI | Unknown |
o4-mini | OpenAI | Unknown |
o1 | OpenAI | Unknown |
o1-mini | OpenAI | Unknown |
Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Mythos 5.1 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Mythos 5 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Sonnet 5 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Opus 4.7 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Opus 4.6 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Opus 4.1 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Haiku 4.5 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Sonnet 4 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Opus 4 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude Sonnet 3.7 | Anthropic | Unknown |
Claude 3.5 Haiku | Anthropic | Unknown |
Gemini 3.8 Flash | Unknown | |
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | Unknown | |
Gemini 3.7 Flash | Unknown | |
Gemini 3.6 Flash | Unknown | |
Gemini 3.5 Flash | Unknown | |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Unknown | |
Gemini 3 Flash Preview MoE | Unknown | |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Unknown | |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite MoE | Unknown | |
Gemini 2.5 Pro MoE | Unknown | |
Gemini 2.5 Flash MoE | Unknown | |
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite MoE | Unknown | |
Gemini 3 Pro MoE | Unknown | |
Gemini 2.0 Flash MoE | Unknown | |
Gemini 1.5 Pro MoE | Unknown | |
Grok 4.7 | xAI | Unknown |
Grok 4.6 | xAI | Unknown |
Grok 4.5 | xAI | Unknown |
Grok 4.3 | xAI | Unknown |
Grok 4.20 Reasoning | xAI | Unknown |
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | xAI | Unknown |
Grok Build 0.1 | xAI | Unknown |
Grok 4 | xAI | Unknown |
Grok 3 | xAI | Unknown |
Grok 2 | xAI | Unknown |
Qwen 3.7 Max MoE | Alibaba | Unknown |
Seed 1.8 | ByteDance | Unknown |
Seed 2.0 Pro | ByteDance | Unknown |
Muse Spark 1.3 | Meta | Unknown |
Muse Spark 1.2 | Meta | Unknown |
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | Kuaishou | Unknown |
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | Kuaishou | Unknown |
Seed 1.6 Flash | ByteDance | Unknown |
Seed 2.0 Lite | ByteDance | Unknown |
Seed 2.0 Mini | ByteDance | Unknown |
Seed 2.0 Code | ByteDance | Unknown |
Seed 2.1 Turbo | ByteDance | Unknown |
Qwen 3.7 Flash | Alibaba | Unknown |
Qwen 3.7 Plus MoE | Alibaba | Unknown |
Amazon Nova 2 Lite | Amazon | Unknown |
Amazon Nova Premier | Amazon | Unknown |
Amazon Nova Pro | Amazon | Unknown |
Amazon Nova Lite | Amazon | Unknown |
Amazon Nova Micro | Amazon | Unknown |
Sonar | Perplexity | Unknown |
Sonar Pro | Perplexity | Unknown |
Sonar Reasoning Pro | Perplexity | Unknown |
Sonar Deep Research | Perplexity | Unknown |
Solar Pro 4 | Upstage | Unknown |
Kimi K3 MoE(104B active) | Moonshot AI | 2.8T |
Qwen 3.8 2.4T A95B MoE(95B active) | Alibaba | 2.4T |
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 MoE(95B active) | Alibaba | 2.4T |
Claude 3 Opus | Anthropic | 2T* |
Llama 4 Behemoth MoE(288B active) | Meta | 2T |
GPT-4 MoE(220B active) | OpenAI | 1.76T* |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro MoE(49B active) | DeepSeek | 1.6T |
LongCat 2.0 MoE(48B active) | Meituan | 1.6T |
Ring 2.6 1T MoE(63B active) | inclusionAI | 1T |
Kimi K2.5 MoE(32B active) | Moonshot AI | 1T |
Kimi K2 Thinking MoE(32B active) | Moonshot AI | 1T |
Kimi K2 0711 MoE(32B active) | Moonshot AI | 1T |
Kimi K2 0905 MoE(32B active) | Moonshot AI | 1T |
Kimi K2.6 MoE(32B active) | Moonshot AI | 1T |
Kimi K2.7 Code MoE(32B active) | Moonshot AI | 1T |
Qwen 3.6 Max-Preview MoE | Alibaba | 1T* |
Yi-Large MoE | 01.AI | 1T |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro MoE(42B active) | Xiaomi | 1T |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed MoE(42B active) | Xiaomi | 1T |
Inkling MoE(41B active) | Thinking Machines Lab | 975B |
GLM-5.2 MoE(40B active) | Z.ai | 744B |
GLM-5.3 MoE(40B active) | Z.ai | 744B |
GLM-5.1 MoE(40B active) | Z.ai | 744B |
GLM-5 MoE(40B active) | Z.ai | 744B |
DeepSeek-V3 0324 MoE(37B active) | DeepSeek | 685B |
Mistral Large 3 MoE(41B active) | Mistral AI | 675B |
DeepSeek-V3.1 Terminus MoE(37B active) | DeepSeek | 671B |
DeepSeek-V3.2 Exp MoE(37B active) | DeepSeek | 671B |
DeepSeek-V3.1 MoE(37B active) | DeepSeek | 671B |
DeepSeek-R1 0528 MoE(37B active) | DeepSeek | 671B |
DeepSeek-V3.2 MoE(37B active) | DeepSeek | 671B |
DeepSeek-V3 MoE(37B active) | DeepSeek | 671B |
DeepSeek-R1 MoE(37B active) | DeepSeek | 671B |
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash MoE | DeepSeek | 552B |
Nemotron 3 Ultra MoE(55B active) | NVIDIA | 550B |
PaLM | 540B | |
Megatron-Turing NLG | NVIDIA | 530B |
Qwen 3 Coder 480B A35B MoE(35B active) | Alibaba | 480B |
MiniMax M1 MoE(45.9B active) | MiniMax | 456B |
MiniMax-01 MoE(45.9B active) | MiniMax | 456B |
MiniMax M3 MoE(23B active) | MiniMax | 428B |
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B MoE(47B active) | Baidu | 424B |
Hermes 4 405B | Nous Research | 405B |
Llama 3.1 405B | Meta | 405B |
Llama 4 Maverick MoE(17B active) | Meta | 400B |
Trinity Large Thinking MoE(13B active) | Arcee AI | 398B |
Nex-N2-Pro MoE(17B active) | Nex AGI | 397B |
Qwen 3.5 397B A17B MoE(17B active) | Alibaba | 397B |
GLM-4.6 MoE(32B active) | Z.ai | 355B |
GLM-4.5 MoE(32B active) | Z.ai | 355B |
Nemotron-4 340B | NVIDIA | 340B |
PaLM 2 | 340B* | |
GLM-5.3-Flash MoE(18B active) | Z.ai | 320B |
Grok 1 MoE(86B active) | xAI | 314B |
MiMo-V2.5 MoE(15B active) | Xiaomi | 310B |
Hy3 MoE(21B active) | Tencent | 295B |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash MoE(13B active) | DeepSeek | 284B |
Inkling Small MoE(12B active) | Thinking Machines Lab | 276B |
DeepSeek-V2 MoE(21B active) | DeepSeek | 236B |
Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 MoE(22B active) | Alibaba | 235B |
Qwen 3 235B A22B MoE(22B active) | Alibaba | 235B |
Qwen 3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 MoE(22B active) | Alibaba | 235B |
Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B MoE(22B active) | Alibaba | 235B |
Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Thinking MoE(22B active) | Alibaba | 235B |
MiniMax M2.1 MoE(10B active) | MiniMax | 230B |
MiniMax M2 MoE(10B active) | MiniMax | 230B |
Seed 1.6 MoE(23B active) | ByteDance | 230B |
GPT-4o | OpenAI | 200B* |
Step 3.7 Flash MoE(11B active) | StepFun | 198B |
Step 3.5 Flash MoE(11B active) | StepFun | 196.8B |
Falcon 180B | TII | 180B |
BLOOM | BigScience | 176B |
GPT-3 | OpenAI | 175B |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Anthropic | 175B* |
OPT-175B | Meta | 175B |
Mixtral 8x22B MoE(39B active) | Mistral AI | 141B |
LaMDA | 137B | |
DBRX MoE(36B active) | Databricks | 132B |
Mistral Medium 3.5 | Mistral AI | 128B |
Qwen 3.8 Flash MoE(6B active) | Alibaba | 125B |
Ling 3.0 Flash MoE(5.1B active) | inclusionAI | 124B |
Mistral Large 2 | Mistral AI | 123B |
Qwen 3.5 122B A10B MoE(10B active) | Alibaba | 122B |
Nemotron 3 Super MoE(12B active) | NVIDIA | 120B |
Mistral Small 4 MoE(6.5B active) | Mistral AI | 119B |
Laguna S 2.1 MoE(8B active) | Poolside | 118B |
GPT OSS 120B MoE(5.1B active) | OpenAI | 117B |
Command A | Cohere | 111B |
Llama 4 Scout MoE(17B active) | Meta | 109B |
GLM-4.6V MoE(12B active) | Z.ai | 106B |
GLM-4.5 Air MoE(12B active) | Z.ai | 106B |
GLM-4.5V MoE(12B active) | Z.ai | 106B |
Command R+ | Cohere | 104B |
Solar Pro 3 MoE(12B active) | Upstage | 102B |
Hunyuan A13B Instruct MoE(13B active) | Tencent | 80B |
Qwen 3 Coder Next MoE(3B active) | Alibaba | 80B |
Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Instruct MoE(3B active) | Alibaba | 80B |
Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Thinking MoE(3B active) | Alibaba | 80B |
Qwen 2.5 72B | Alibaba | 72.7B |
Virtuoso Large | Arcee AI | 72B |
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B | Alibaba | 72B |
Hermes 4 70B | Nous Research | 70B |
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B | DeepSeek | 70B |
Claude 3 Sonnet | Anthropic | 70B* |
Llama 3.3 70B | Meta | 70B |
Llama 3.1 70B | Meta | 70B |
Llama 3 70B | Meta | 70B |
Llama 2 70B | Meta | 70B |
Mixtral 8x7B MoE(12.9B active) | Mistral AI | 46.7B |
Falcon 40B | TII | 40B |
Nex-N2-mini MoE(3B active) | Nex AGI | 35B |
Qwen 3.6 35B A3B MoE(3B active) | Alibaba | 35B |
Qwen 3.5 35B A3B MoE(3B active) | Alibaba | 35B |
Yi-34B | 01.AI | 34B |
Laguna XS 2.1 MoE(3B active) | Poolside | 33B |
Qwen 3 32B | Alibaba | 32.8B |
Qwen 3 VL 32B | Alibaba | 32.8B |
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | Alibaba | 32.5B |
Qwen 2.5 32B | Alibaba | 32B |
Command R | Cohere | 32B |
Solar Pro 2 | Upstage | 31B |
Gemma 4 31B | 30.7B | |
Qwen 3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 MoE(3.3B active) | Alibaba | 30.5B |
Qwen 3 Coder 30B A3B MoE(3.3B active) | Alibaba | 30.5B |
Qwen 3 30B A3B MoE(3.3B active) | Alibaba | 30.5B |
Qwen 3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 MoE(3.3B active) | Alibaba | 30.5B |
Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B MoE(3.3B active) | Alibaba | 30.5B |
Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Thinking MoE(3.3B active) | Alibaba | 30.5B |
Nemotron 3 Nano MoE(3.5B active) | NVIDIA | 30B |
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning MoE(3B active) | NVIDIA | 30B |
GLM-4.7-Flash MoE(3B active) | Z.ai | 30B |
Muse Glimmer 30B | Meta | 29.6B |
Gemma 3 27B | 27B | |
Qwen 3.8 27B | Alibaba | 27B |
Qwen 3.5 27B | Alibaba | 27B |
Qwen 3.6 27B | Alibaba | 27B |
Gemma 2 27B | 27B | |
Gemma 4 26B A4B MoE(3.8B active) | 25.2B | |
Mistral Small 3.2 | Mistral AI | 24B |
Mistral Small 3.1 | Mistral AI | 24B |
Voxtral Small 24B | Mistral AI | 24B |
Mistral Small 3 | Mistral AI | 24B |
GPT OSS 20B MoE(3.6B active) | OpenAI | 21B |
Claude 3 Haiku | Anthropic | 20B* |
Qwen 3 14B | Alibaba | 14.8B |
Qwen 2.5 14B | Alibaba | 14B |
Phi-4 | Microsoft | 14B |
Ministral 3 14B | Mistral AI | 13.9B |
Nemotron Nano 2 VL 12B | NVIDIA | 12.6B |
Gemma 3 12B | 12B | |
Mistral Nemo | Mistral AI | 12B |
Solar Mini | Upstage | 10.7B |
Qwen 3.5 9B | Alibaba | 9B |
Gemma 2 9B | 9B | |
Nemotron Nano 2 9B | NVIDIA | 9B |
Ministral 3 8B | Mistral AI | 8.8B |
Qwen 3 8B | Alibaba | 8.2B |
Qwen 3 VL 8B | Alibaba | 8.2B |
Qwen 3 VL 8B Thinking | Alibaba | 8.2B |
Granite 4.1 8B | IBM | 8B |
Gemma 3n E4B | 8B | |
GPT-4o mini | OpenAI | 8B* |
Llama 3.1 8B | Meta | 8B |
Llama 3 8B | Meta | 8B |
Ministral 8B | Mistral AI | 8B |
Qwen 2.5 7B | Alibaba | 7.6B |
Mistral 7B | Mistral AI | 7B |
Command R7B | Cohere | 7B |
Phi-4 Multimodal | Microsoft | 5.6B |
Gemma 3 4B | 4B | |
Ministral 3 3B | Mistral AI | 3.8B |
Phi-4 mini | Microsoft | 3.8B |
Phi-3 mini | Microsoft | 3.8B |
Gemini Nano 2 | 3.3B | |
Llama 3.2 3B | Meta | 3.2B |
Granite 4.0 H Micro | IBM | 3B |
Ministral 3B | Mistral AI | 3B |
Gemma 2 2B | 2B | |
Gemini Nano 1 | 1.8B | |
GPT-2 | OpenAI | 1.5B |
Llama 3.2 1B | Meta | 1.2B |
Qwen 2.5 0.5B | Alibaba | 0.5B |
Parameter sizes of popular Large Language Models (as of August 2026)
4. Context Windows: From 200,000 to 10 Million Tokens
The context window determines how much text a model can process at once. Here the orders of magnitude have multiplied over the past two years. The overview below covers more than 320 current models, sortable and filterable by provider:
Model | Developer | Context Window |
|---|---|---|
| Meta | 10.5M | |
| Alibaba | 10M | |
2M | ||
2M | ||
| xAI | 2M | |
| xAI | 2M | |
| OpenAI | 1.1M | |
| OpenAI | 1.1M | |
| OpenAI | 1.1M | |
| OpenAI | 1.1M | |
| OpenAI | 1.1M | |
| OpenAI | 1.1M | |
| OpenAI | 1.1M | |
| OpenAI | 1.1M | |
| OpenAI | 1.1M | |
| OpenAI | 1.1M | |
| Meta | 1M | |
1M | ||
1M | ||
1M | ||
1M | ||
1M | ||
1M | ||
1M | ||
1M | ||
1M | ||
1M | ||
1M | ||
| Moonshot AI | 1M | |
| Meta | 1M | |
| Meta | 1M | |
| Poolside | 1M | |
| OpenAI | 1M | |
| OpenAI | 1M | |
| OpenAI | 1M | |
1M | ||
1M | ||
1M | ||
| xAI | 1M | |
| xAI | 1M | |
| xAI | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| Anthropic | 1M | |
| DeepSeek | 1M | |
| DeepSeek | 1M | |
| DeepSeek | 1M | |
| MiniMax | 1M | |
| Alibaba | 1M | |
| Alibaba | 1M | |
| Alibaba | 1M | |
| Meituan | 1M | |
| Thinking Machines Lab | 1M | |
| Thinking Machines Lab | 1M | |
| Alibaba | 1M | |
| Alibaba | 1M | |
| Alibaba | 1M | |
| Alibaba | 1M | |
| Z.ai | 1M | |
| Z.ai | 1M | |
| Z.ai | 1M | |
| Xiaomi | 1M | |
| Xiaomi | 1M | |
| Xiaomi | 1M | |
| MiniMax | 1M | |
| NVIDIA | 1M | |
| NVIDIA | 1M | |
| NVIDIA | 1M | |
| NVIDIA | 1M | |
| Amazon | 1M | |
| Amazon | 1M | |
| Amazon | 1M | |
| MiniMax | 1M | |
| Upstage | 512K | |
| xAI | 500K | |
| xAI | 500K | |
| xAI | 500K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| OpenAI | 400K | |
| Amazon | 300K | |
| Amazon | 300K | |
| Mistral AI | 262.14K | |
| Mistral AI | 262.14K | |
| Moonshot AI | 262.14K | |
| Moonshot AI | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Poolside | 262.14K | |
| Nex AGI | 262.14K | |
| Nex AGI | 262.14K | |
| Tencent | 262.14K | |
| Tencent | 262.14K | |
| inclusionAI | 262.14K | |
| inclusionAI | 262.14K | |
| Arcee AI | 262.14K | |
262.14K | ||
262.14K | ||
| Mistral AI | 262.14K | |
| Mistral AI | 262.14K | |
| Mistral AI | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Alibaba | 262.14K | |
| Moonshot AI | 262.14K | |
| Moonshot AI | 262.14K | |
| Moonshot AI | 262.14K | |
| xAI | 256K | |
| xAI | 256K | |
| xAI | 256K | |
| Mistral AI | 256K | |
| Mistral AI | 256K | |
| Alibaba | 256K | |
| ByteDance | 256K | |
| ByteDance | 256K | |
| Kuaishou | 256K | |
| Kuaishou | 256K | |
| ByteDance | 256K | |
| ByteDance | 256K | |
| ByteDance | 256K | |
| ByteDance | 256K | |
| ByteDance | 256K | |
| ByteDance | 256K | |
| StepFun | 256K | |
| StepFun | 256K | |
| Cohere | 256K | |
| Cohere | 256K | |
| AI21 Labs | 256K | |
| AI21 Labs | 256K | |
| AI21 Labs | 256K | |
| MiniMax | 245.76K | |
| MiniMax | 204.8K | |
| MiniMax | 204.8K | |
| MiniMax | 204.8K | |
| MiniMax | 204.8K | |
| Z.ai | 204.8K | |
| Z.ai | 204.8K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| Anthropic | 200K | |
| OpenAI | 200K | |
| OpenAI | 200K | |
| OpenAI | 200K | |
| OpenAI | 200K | |
| OpenAI | 200K | |
| Z.ai | 200K | |
| Z.ai | 200K | |
| Perplexity | 200K | |
| Z.ai | 200K | |
| 01.AI | 200K | |
| 01.AI | 200K | |
| DeepSeek | 163.84K | |
| DeepSeek | 163.84K | |
| DeepSeek | 163.84K | |
| Meta | 131.07K | |
| Meta | 131.07K | |
| Meta | 131.07K | |
| Meta | 131.07K | |
| Meta | 131.07K | |
| xAI | 131.07K | |
| Mistral AI | 131.07K | |
| Alibaba | 131.07K | |
| Alibaba | 131.07K | |
| Alibaba | 131.07K | |
| Meta | 131.07K | |
| Upstage | 131.07K | |
| Baidu | 131.07K | |
| IBM | 131.07K | |
| IBM | 131.07K | |
| Arcee AI | 131.07K | |
| Nous Research | 131.07K | |
| Nous Research | 131.07K | |
| OpenAI | 131.07K | |
| OpenAI | 131.07K | |
| Mistral AI | 131.07K | |
| Mistral AI | 131.07K | |
| Alibaba | 131.07K | |
| Alibaba | 131.07K | |
| Alibaba | 131.07K | |
| Alibaba | 131.07K | |
| Alibaba | 131.07K | |
| Moonshot AI | 131.07K | |
| Z.ai | 131.07K | |
| Z.ai | 131.07K | |
| Z.ai | 131.07K | |
| Meta | 128K | |
| Meta | 128K | |
| Meta | 128K | |
128K | ||
128K | ||
128K | ||
| xAI | 128K | |
| OpenAI | 128K | |
| OpenAI | 128K | |
| OpenAI | 128K | |
| OpenAI | 128K | |
| OpenAI | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| Mistral AI | 128K | |
| Mistral AI | 128K | |
| Mistral AI | 128K | |
| Alibaba | 128K | |
| Alibaba | 128K | |
| Alibaba | 128K | |
| Alibaba | 128K | |
| Alibaba | 128K | |
| Alibaba | 128K | |
| Alibaba | 128K | |
| Alibaba | 128K | |
| Alibaba | 128K | |
| NVIDIA | 128K | |
| NVIDIA | 128K | |
| Cohere | 128K | |
| Perplexity | 128K | |
| Perplexity | 128K | |
| Perplexity | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| DeepSeek | 128K | |
| Alibaba | 128K | |
| Cohere | 128K | |
| Cohere | 128K | |
| Amazon | 128K | |
| Microsoft | 128K | |
| Microsoft | 128K | |
| Microsoft | 128K | |
| Microsoft | 128K | |
| Microsoft | 128K | |
| Microsoft | 128K | |
| 01.AI | 128K | |
| 01.AI | 128K | |
| Nvidia | 128K | |
| Nvidia | 128K | |
| Nvidia | 128K | |
| Reka | 128K | |
| Reka | 128K | |
| Reka | 128K | |
| Zhipu AI | 128K | |
| Zhipu AI | 128K | |
| Baidu | 128K | |
| Mistral AI | 65.54K | |
| Upstage | 65.54K | |
| Z.ai | 65.54K | |
| Microsoft | 64K | |
| Mistral AI | 32.77K | |
| Mistral AI | 32.77K | |
| Mistral AI | 32.77K | |
| Alibaba | 32.77K | |
| Alibaba | 32.77K | |
| Alibaba | 32.77K | |
| Upstage | 32.77K | |
32.77K | ||
| Microsoft | 32.77K | |
| Databricks | 32.77K | |
32K | ||
| Mistral AI | 32K | |
| 01.AI | 32K | |
| Microsoft | 16.38K | |
| 01.AI | 16K | |
8.19K | ||
8.19K | ||
| OpenAI | 8.19K | |
| AI21 Labs | 8.19K | |
| Zhipu AI | 8.19K | |
| Baidu | 8K | |
| Cohere | 4.1K | |
| Nvidia | 4.1K | |
| Stability AI | 4.1K | |
| Stability AI | 4.1K |
Context window sizes of current AI language models (as of August 2026)
At the top are Llama 4 Scout and Qwen-Long with 10 million tokens each. That's roughly 30 Harry Potter books in a single prompt. Current all-rounders mostly sit around 1 million tokens, including GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Luna, Claude Opus 5.5, Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1, Claude Opus 5, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Muse Spark 1.3, Qwen 3.8 Flash, and Qwen 3.8 Max 0902. Qwen 3.8 Flash Next offers a native 262,144-token window and can be extended to 1 million tokens with YaRN. For more on the individual model families, see our overviews of the Claude models and Gemini models.
5. What Does an LLM Cost? Prices per 1 Million Tokens
API prices span worlds. The cheapest model with API access is GPT-5 nano at $0.05 per 1M input tokens. The most expensive is GPT-5.5 Pro at $30, a 600x difference.
More interesting than the raw price is the ratio of price to performance. The chart below plots input price against coding performance (SWE-bench Verified). Models toward the bottom right are ideal: strong and cheap.
The quiet star of this chart is DeepSeek-V4-Pro. Even the April preview build scores 77.4% on SWE-bench at Vals AI and, at just $0.66 input price, sits right on the efficiency frontier, no other model is both stronger and cheaper. The generally available build from August 13 reaches 96.4%. So if you don't strictly need the last few percentage points of coding performance, the open models offer an extremely good price-performance ratio. Qwen 3.8 Flash is listed at $0.113 input and $0.382 output per 1 million tokens in the official price list. QwenCloud uses the same API name, qwen3.8-flash, for Qwen 3.8 Flash Next, so the price is not counted as a second row. For a detailed cost estimate of your specific usage, see the API cost calculator.
6. LLM Performance Head to Head
To make the strengths and weaknesses of the top models visible at a glance, the radar below compares five representative frontier models across four dimensions: reasoning, coding, context window, and price efficiency. Each axis is scaled relative to the five models so even small leads become visible. The real values appear in the tooltip.
The pattern is clear. Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.5 dominate on raw coding performance but are expensive. Gemini 3.5 Flash flips that, nearly on par on reasoning and only trailing on coding, yet with the best price efficiency in the field. Every AI project comes down to this one trade-off in the end, maximum quality versus maximum economy.
7. Open Source vs. Proprietary
One of the most important developments of 2026 is the catch-up of open models. Of the 288 tracked models, 126 are proprietary and 162 are openly available, 157 of them open-weights and 5 fully open-source.
But at the very top:
According to the Stanford AI Index 2026, the best closed model led the best open-weights model by 3.3 percentage points in early 2026. In August 2024, the gap had been only 0.5 percentage points. So at the top it has not been shrinking but widening again, with six of the top-ten models in the Chatbot Arena now closed once more. Coding looks different. In the Vals AI harness, the generally available DeepSeek-V4-Pro build from August 13, 2026 scores 96.4% on SWE-bench Verified, just 0.6 percentage points behind Claude Opus 5 at 97.0%. Vals AI archived the benchmark as saturated on September 1, 2026, so the top scores barely separate the models anymore. For an overview of the best free models, see our article on open-source LLMs.
How the license mix breaks down by provider is shown below: column width represents the number of tracked models per provider, and the colors mark the license type.
8. Knowledge Cutoff: How Current Are the Models?
Every model has a knowledge cutoff, after which it has learned nothing more about the world. Claude Opus 5.5 currently has the freshest cutoff in our database, June 2026, closely followed by GPT-6 Luna at May 18, 2026:
Between the knowledge cutoff and the release date there are usually six to eight months in which the model is trained and tested. For current events, the models therefore almost always need a web search. Raw model knowledge is always a few months old.
9. Release Pace: The Cadence of the Labs
How fast the market moves shows in the release timeline. What happened quarterly in 2024 comes almost monthly in 2026:
Plotting every tracked model onto its release month makes the clustering visible: the darker a cell, the more models shipped that month.
December 2025 was especially dense, when Google, OpenAI, and Mistral all shipped new flagships in the same month. So was April 2026, which brought GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, DeepSeek-V4-Pro, Kimi K2.6, and Qwen 3.6 Max, five top models at once. Qwen 3.8 Flash and Qwen 3.8 Flash Next followed at the end of August 2026, and September 2026 piled on again with GPT-6 Astra, Claude Fable 5.1, Mythos 5.1, and, on September 22, three more models at once (Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Luna). If you want to keep up here, don't cling too tightly to individual version numbers.
10. Model Status: Active, Deprecated, Legacy
Not every model ever released is still usable. Across the three big providers Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI, we track the lifecycle of 97 models. Here is how they split across the individual statuses:
Just over half of the models are still active, and nearly a third are already deprecated. And lifecycles are getting shorter. A good example is Gemini 3 Pro, deprecated only about three months after its release because Gemini 3.1 Pro was already standing by as a successor. Anyone building production systems on a model has to keep an active eye on these deprecations.
11. Market Position and Conclusion
The LLM market of 2026 has grown up. Instead of one dominant model, there's a tight leading pack of OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, closely chased by open models from China, led by DeepSeek and Moonshot.
Bottom line:
Performance at the top is remarkably close together, and the competition is shifting to price, context length, and specialization. For most applications in 2026, it matters less which model is the absolute best and more which one is right for the specific purpose and budget. If you want to dig deeper into individual providers, you'll find the details in our statistics on OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Grok, and DeepSeek.






